Zippel 2007.
Methods | RCT, double‐blind (non‐inferiority study) Follow‐up time: 2 days |
|
Participants |
Population: 370 participants, 202 women and 168 men; mean age ± SD (range): dexketoprofen group: 48.5 ± 13.31 (21 to 75), diclofenac group: 50.0 ± 13.26 (20 to 74) Setting: multicentre trial conducted in 21 centres in Belgium, Germany, and Poland Inclusion: male/female outpatients aged 18 to 75 years with acute low back pain of moderate to severe intensity (≥ 50 mm on a visual analogue scale (VAS)), and of no more than 1 week's duration Exclusion: low back pain secondary to systemic or degenerative diseases, vertebral fractures or compressions; intervertebral disc hernia; neoplastic, infectious or metabolic diseases; and neurological pain. General contraindications to the use of NSAIDs. Concomitant treatment with steroidal drugs, alternative therapies, and use of any analgesic within 6 hours prior to inclusion in the study |
|
Interventions |
NSAID (i): dexketoprofen 50 mg IM (Menarini, Florence, Italy), twice daily; 2 days (N = 183) NSAID (ii): diclofenac 75 mg IM (Voltarol®, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Horsham, West Sussex, UK), twice daily; 2 days (N = 187) |
|
Outcomes | Outcomes in ITT population Mean (± SD) changes in sum of analogue pain intensity difference scores (SAPID0‐6) from baseline to 6 hours after the first dose 111.8 ± 116.54 (i) versus 112.7 ± 105.71 (ii). Adjusted mean 111.9 (i) and 112.7 (ii); Adjusted ratio of means 0.993. 95% lower CI (two‐sided) 0.79 Adjusted mean SAPID0‐last score was 296.0 mm/h in (i) and 283.8 mm/h in (ii), with no statistical differences between treatments (P = 0.567). The median change in RDQ scores was ‐6.0 for both treatment groups (P = 0.695), showing an improvement on the disability scale Rescue medication: taken by 39% of participants in (i) and 33% of participants in (ii), no statistical differences between treatments (P = 0.235) Adverse events: (i) 50/183 = 27% (4 participants withdrew), (ii) 58/187 = 31% (2 participants withdrew) |
|
Funding | Financially supported by a grant from Menarini Ricerche SpA, Florence, Italy (manufacturer of dexketoprofen). Not mentioned if they had a role in study design, data collection, or analysis. | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | participants were randomly assigned according to a computer‐generated randomisation schedule. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not mentioned |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes ‐ participants | Low risk | Study drugs were administered by a person from outside the investigational team. It was not mentioned if they were similar in size, shape, and colour. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes ‐ careproviders | Unclear risk | Study drugs were administered by a person from outside the investigational team. It was unclear if this was their own careprovider. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes ‐ outcome assessors | Low risk | Study drugs were administered by a person from outside the investigational team in order to maintain the double‐blind nature of the study. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes ‐ dropouts | Low risk | (i) 10/173 participants withdrew, (ii) 10/177 participants withdrew |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes ‐ ITT analysis | Low risk | ITT analysis performed |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Trial registration not mentioned |
Similarity at baseline characteristics | Low risk | Baseline characteristics similar |
Co‐interventions avoided or similar | Low risk | Paracetamol 500 mg, maximum 3g a day, was used as rescue medication. |
Compliance acceptable | Unclear risk | Compliance was not mentioned, (unused) study medication was not collected. |
Timing outcome assessments similar | Low risk | Timing similar |
Other bias | Low risk | None |
b.i.d. = twice a day; CI = confidence interval; CRF = case report form; FU = follow‐up; GI = gastrointestinal; GP = general practitioner; IM = intramuscular; ITT = intention‐to‐treat; IV = intravenous; LBP = low back pain; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; NRS = numeric rating scale; NSAID = non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug; PI = pain intensity; PP = per protocol; QBPDS = Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale; RCT = randomised controlled trial; RMDQ = Roland‐Morris Disability Questionnaire; q.i.d.= four times a day; ROM = range of motion; SD = standard deviation; SLR = straight‐leg raise; SF‐12/36 = 12 or 36‐item Short Form Health Survey; t.i.d. = three times a day; VAS = visual analogue scale; wks = weeks