Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 16;2020(4):CD012005. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012005.pub2

Raftery 2013.

Methods RCT, double‐blinded
Participants Crohn’s disease, in remission and on stable drug therapies for at least 1 month at study entry
Exclusion criteria: Symptomatic CD (CDAI > 150); pregnancy; previous extensive small bowel research; presence of an ileostomy or colostomy; known hypersensitivity to vitamin D; hypercalcaemia; those currently using supplemental vitamin D > 800 IU/D; diagnosis of any of the following: active tuberculosis, sarcoidosis, hyperparathyroidism, renal failure, pseudohyperparathyroidism, malignancy, active lymphoma, short bowel syndrome; antibiotic use in the 4 weeks prior to enrollment; current use of bisphosphonates; renal impairment, diabetes mellitus; participants participating in a concurrent RCT; alcohol dependency
A total of 27 participants were randomised to the intervention (vitamin D3, n = not reported) or control group (placebo, n = not reported)
Loss to follow‐up: Not reported
Interventions Vitamin D3
Dosing regimen: 2000 IU per day
Mode of delivery: Oral
Duration: 3 months
Setting: 2 centres in the Republic of Ireland
Comparision treatment: Placebo (soya bean oil)
Co‐interventions: None
Outcomes Fatigue was assessed using the MFI.
Quality of life was assessed using the IBDQ.
Adverse events were not assessed.
Other outcomes assessed: Change in hand grip strength; disease activity (CDAI), FBC, CRP, serum 25OHD
Assessment time points: Baseline and month 3
Notes No additional information supplied by the author
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double‐blind but no further information provided
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Self‐reported outcomes but details of blinding not explicit
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk The number of participants included in the analysis was not reported.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Reported only the difference in muscle strength scores for the intervention and control groups. Changes in fatigue and quality of life scores from baseline to month 3 presented for those who achieved 25OHD levels ≥ 75nmol/L compared to those with 25OHD levels < 75nmol/L only.
Other bias Unclear risk Baseline group characteristics not reported