Table 7.
Comparative validity analyses regressing decision performance on numeracy scales—Study 2
Ratio bias task | Bets task | Framing task | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pearson r | Bets condition | Numeracy scale | Interaction | R 2 | Framing condition | Numeracy scale | Interaction | R 2 | |
CRT | .11 | 0.91** | 0.57** | 0.24* | .11 | 0.47** | −0.03 | −0.1** | .27 |
Lipkus et al. | .14 | 0.92** | 0.15 | 0.11* | .09 | 0.47** | −0.03* | −0.02 | .26 |
Rasch‐
based |
.16 | 0.92** | 0.26** | 0.16** | .10 | 0.48** | −0.04* | −0.05** | .27 |
Note. CRT, cognitive reflection test.
p < .05,
p < .01. Each row reflects a separate regression analysis. Unstandardized coefficients and effect sizes are shown for each independent variable.