Table 1.
Series | Sample polarization | Transition probed | Number of runs | Average pulse energy (pJ) | Number of frequencies | Number of pulses per frequency | Number of trapped atoms | Microwave counts | Laser counts | Counts upon release |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Single | 1Scd→2Pc± | 4 | 600 | 12 | 24,000 | 2,004 | – | 1,197 | 807 |
2 | Single | 1Scd→2Pf± | 4 | 550 | 12 | 24,000 | 2,012 | – | 1,075 | 937 |
3 | Double | 1Sd→2Pc− | 2 | 440 | 12 | 12,000 | 1,044 | 527 | 229 | 288 |
4 | Double | 1Sd→2Pf− | 2 | 720 | 12 | 12,000 | 971 | 463 | 341 | 167 |
The experimental parameters, together with the number of antihydrogen events detected during the microwave irradiation, the laser irradiation and the release of the remaining atoms, are tabulated for each series. The machine-learning analysis identifies annihilation events with an estimated efficiency of 0.849 for the microwave irradiation, 0.807 for the laser irradiation and 0.851 for the release of the remaining atoms. The number of counts is corrected for the detection efficiencies. The number of trapped atoms is derived from the sum of the other counts.