Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 16;10:6535. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63558-8

Table 2.

Comparison of the kapp, Ea, ∆S# and ∆H# values of previously reported catalysts for reduction of MO.

Entry Catalyst kapp (min−1) Ea (kJ/mol) ∆S# (J/mol.K) ∆H# (kJ/mol) Ref.
1 CSIOAga 6 * 10−4 (s−1) 76.10 −29.20 73.60 32
2 IOAgb NR 102.4 +41 99.9 32
3 CuO nanostructure (35 °C) 1 * 10−2 59.84 −96.20 57.20 33
4 Co:La:TiO2 (30 ºC) 7.72 * 10−3 NR −69.15 35.33 34
5 TiO2 (30 ºC) 5.26 * 10−3 NR −69.76 24.07 34
6 Fe3O4/Hal-Mel-TEA(IL)-Pd 4.5 * 10−2 (s−1) 42.02 −139.06 39.40 This work

a: Ag-coated chitosan-capped γ-Fe2O3

b: CSIOAg catalyst without chitosan

NR: Not reported.