Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 16;5:17. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00221-w

Table 6.

Goodness of fit, badness of fit, and fit indices for each structural equation model

One factor Problem type (reclassified) Problem context (reclassified) Level of spatial thinking
Teaching difficulty
 CFI .91 .91 .90 .93
 TLI .88 .88 .88 .90
 RMSEA .09 .09 .09 .08
 SRMR .05 .06 .06 .05
 AIC 4583 4585 4583 4570
 ECVI 1.06 1.06 1.07 0.98
Spatial-thinking involvement
 CFI .92 .92 .91 .93
 TLI .90 .89 .89 .91
 RMSEA .07 .08 .08 .07
 SRMR .06 .06 .06 .06
 AIC 5108 5110 5110 5100
 ECVI 0.89 0.91 0.90 0.85
Visualization helpfulness
 CFI .92 .92 .91 .97
 TLI .90 .89 .89 .96
 RMSEA .07 .07 .07 .05
 SRMR .07 .06 .07 .05
 AIC 4821 4825 4826 4800
 ECVI 0.85 0.87 0.88 0.72

CFI Comparative Fit Index, TLI Tucker Lewis Index, RMSEA Root Mean Square Error of Approximation, SRMR Standardized Root Mean Square Residual, AIC Akaike Information Criterion, ECVI Expected Cross Validation Index