Skip to main content
. 2010 May 12;2010(5):CD004004. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004004.pub3

Kacperek 2001.

Methods Single centre. 
 Allocation: unclear. 
 Masking: participant ‐ no; provider ‐ no; outcome ‐ no. 
 Exclusions after randomisation: not stated.
Participants Country: UK. 
 Number randomised: 66. 
 Mean age: 76 years. 
 Sex: 
 Inclusion criteria: Aged 50+ with subfoveal CNV (classic) and evidence of AMD e.g. drusen, VA > 6/60. 
 Exclusion criteria: diabetes, severe hypertension and retinal vascular disease, myopia.
Interventions Treatment: 18 Gy (4 x 4.5 Gy). 
 Control: observation. 
 Duration:4 days.
Outcomes Visual acuity.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk "Patients [...] were randomised to between treatment and control". Page 7, introduction.
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk Not reported.
Blinding? 
 Visual acuity High risk No masking reported. No sham intervention in the control group.
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes High risk 38 patients in the treatment arm, 28 for the control arm.
28/38 and 20/28 seen at 12 months. No information on people not seen.
Free of selective reporting? High risk See additional table 3.
Free of other bias? Low risk