Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD004001. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004001.pub3

Comparison 3. Clinical improvement.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Reaching Fontaine stage II 2 124 Risk Difference (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.33 [0.19, 0.47]
2 Reaching Fontaine stage III 2 206 Risk Difference (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.07 [‐0.24, 0.38]
3 Ulcer healing and hypertension 2 72 Risk Difference (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.54 [‐0.73, ‐0.35]
3.1 Hypertensives 1 44 Risk Difference (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.57 [‐0.80, ‐0.33]
3.2 Non‐hypertensives 1 28 Risk Difference (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.5 [‐0.82, ‐0.18]