Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 16;6(4):e03776. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03776

Table 2.

Comparison on values of f″(0) with the results of Khan and Pop [12] and Ullah and Zaman [23] (when Pr = 0.73, Nb = 0.0001, Le = 0.1, Bi1 → ∞, Bi2 → ∞, n = δ = A = Da = M = Rd = Gr = Gc = S = Ω = Q = Ec = 0) against some values of m.

m Khan & Pop (2013)
Ullah & Zaman(2017)
Present study
f″(0) f″(0) f″(0) θ′(0) φ′(0)
0 0.4696 0.4696 0.4688 0.4228 0.2326
1/23 - 0.5690 0.5693 0.4598 0.2348
1/11 0.6550 0.6550 0.6554 0.4818 0.2453
1/7 - 0.7320 0.7322 0.5090 0.2516
1/5 0.8021 0.8021 0.8023 0.5402 0.2669
1/3 0.9277 0.9277 0.9277 0.5904 0.2699
1/2 1.0389 - 1.0389 0.6369 0.2822
1 1.2326 1.2326 1.2326 0.7202 0.3063
5 - 1.5504 1.5503 0.8648 0.3517
100 - 1.6794 1.6794 0.9252 0.3726
- 1.6872 1.6872 0.9289 0.3734