Table 2.
Comparison on values of f″(0) with the results of Khan and Pop [12] and Ullah and Zaman [23] (when Pr = 0.73, Nb = 0.0001, Le = 0.1, Bi1 → ∞, Bi2 → ∞, n = δ = A = Da = M = Rd = Gr = Gc = S = Ω = Q = Ec = 0) against some values of m.
| m | Khan & Pop (2013) |
Ullah & Zaman(2017) |
Present study |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| f″(0) | f″(0) | f″(0) | −θ′(0) | −φ′(0) | |
| 0 | 0.4696 | 0.4696 | 0.4688 | 0.4228 | 0.2326 |
| 1/23 | - | 0.5690 | 0.5693 | 0.4598 | 0.2348 |
| 1/11 | 0.6550 | 0.6550 | 0.6554 | 0.4818 | 0.2453 |
| 1/7 | - | 0.7320 | 0.7322 | 0.5090 | 0.2516 |
| 1/5 | 0.8021 | 0.8021 | 0.8023 | 0.5402 | 0.2669 |
| 1/3 | 0.9277 | 0.9277 | 0.9277 | 0.5904 | 0.2699 |
| 1/2 | 1.0389 | - | 1.0389 | 0.6369 | 0.2822 |
| 1 | 1.2326 | 1.2326 | 1.2326 | 0.7202 | 0.3063 |
| 5 | - | 1.5504 | 1.5503 | 0.8648 | 0.3517 |
| 100 | - | 1.6794 | 1.6794 | 0.9252 | 0.3726 |
| ∞ | - | 1.6872 | 1.6872 | 0.9289 | 0.3734 |