Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 7;98(5):1334–1348. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1788

Table 2.

Niche specialization, pair‐wise niche overlap and community niche overlap test results for dominant species in the 50‐ha plot. (a) Spatial‐only analysis of all individuals in 2008, (b) temporal‐only analysis of all individuals during 1988–2012, and (c) spatiotemporal analysis of recruits during 1989–2008

(a)
Niche specialization Niche overlap (Community overlap = +0.48 *** )
ANOL CASF HELI KYDC LAGL RAND TECG
ANOL 14.4
CASF 18.05 0.53
HELI 14.92 0.33 +0.5 *
KYDC 14.4 0.31 0.45 +0.56 **
LAGL 20.25 0.37 * 0.55 0.44 0.39
RAND 16.98 0.42 +0.55 * +0.49 * +0.45 * 0.48
TECG 16.55 * +0.58 * 0.61 0.38 0.37 0.51 * 0.48
TERT 15.83 * +0.61 * 0.62 0.37 0.35 0.5 0.48 +0.66 *
(b)
Niche specialization Niche overlap (Community overlap = 0.79)
ANOL CASF HELI KYDC LAGL LAGP TECG
ANOL 332
CASF 327.33 0.91
HELI 265.26 0.58 0.64
KYDC 270.92 0.68 0.71 +0.8
LAGL 326.32 0.95 +0.95 0.63 0.72
RAND 293.98 0.7 0.77 +0.83 0.79 0.75
TECG 327.86 0.96 0.94 0.61 0.71 0.98 0.73
TERT 331.5 +0.99 * 0.91 0.59 0.69 0.95 0.71 0.97
(c)
Niche specialization Niche overlap (Community overlap = +0.61 *** )
CASF HELI KYDC LAGL RAND
CASF 9861.67
HELI 4194.23 0.49
KYDC 7646.75 0.61 +0.76 *
LAGL 9079.29 +0.84 * 0.56 0.63
RAND 5268.38 0.53 +0.67 0.62 +0.6
TECG 8526.74 0.73 0.39 0.53 0.68 0.48

Species codes: ANOL, Anogeissus latifolia; CASF, Cassia fistula; HELI, Helicteres isora; KYDC, Kydia calycina; LAGL, Lagerstroemia microcarpa; RAND, Catunaregam spinosa; TECG, Tectona grandis; TERT, Terminalia crenulata. Niche space is defined by (1) the first 5 principal components of edaphic and topographic variables, (2) annual precipitation, and (3) elevation and annual precipitation. Tests for niche specialization are one‐tailed and the test statistic is the generalized standard deviation of species occupancy; values smaller than the 5% quantile of randomizations have a ‘−’ prefix. Tests for niche overlap are two‐tailed and the test statistic is the overlap statistic; values smaller (greater) than the 2.5% (97.5%) quantile of randomizations have a ‘−’ (‘+’) prefix.

Statistically significant results after adjustment for multiple‐hypothesis testing (separately for each analysis and separately for niche specialization and niche overlap) are shown in boldface; *< 0.05, **< 0.01, ***< 0.001.

This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.