Skip to main content
. 2009 Feb 17;21(1):12–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2008.01143.x

Table 3.

Factors associated with likely attendance at work in scenarios one and two

Scenario one: one avian influenza admission Scenario two: influenza pandemic
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Significant factors, multiple logistical regression model:††
 Employment status
  Part‐time 1.0 1.0
  Full‐time 2.3* (1.1–4.9) 2.7** (1.4–5.0)
 Pregnancy in family
  No 1.0 1.0
  Yes 0.1*** (0.03–0.3) 0.04*** (0.01–0.3)
 Required in the ED for work
  No 1.0 1.0
  Yes 1.9* (1.1–3.4) 1.8* (1.1–2.8)
 Working with acute medical patients
  No 1.0 1.0
  Yes 1.9* (1.02–3.4) 2.0* (1.1–3.4)
Other factors of interest:†††
 Sex
  Male 1.0 1.0
  Female 0.8 (0.4–1.6) 0.7 (0.4–1.1)
 Medical level
  Intern 1.0 1.0
  Registrar 1.4 (0.3–7.6) 1.4 (0.6–3.8)
  Consultant 1.0 (0.2–6.5) 1.3 (0.4–4.0)
 Dependants
  No 1.0 1.0
  Yes 0.9 (0.5–1.7) 0.8 (0.5–1.3)
*

P < 0.05;

**

P < 0.01;

***

P < 0.001.

Reference group.

††

Significant factors as predicted by forward logistical regression analysis.

†††

Other factors, as predicted by logistical regression analysis. OR > 1 represents group less likely to be absent (more likely to work). OR < 1 represents group more likely to be absent (less likely to work). OR, odds ratio.