Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 16;20:141. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01533-8

Table 3.

Associations between participants’ characteristics and FoF by social support level, adjusted logistic analysis (n = 725)

Fear of falling
Model 1
Low - moderate social support level
(n = 423)
Model 2
High social support level
(n = 302)
AOR (95% CI)1 AOR (95% CI)
 Gender Male 1 1
Female 1.99 (1.10–3.59)* 1.91 (0.93–3.92)
 Age (yr) 60–69 1 1
70–79 1.13 (0.63–2.02) 1.61 (0.77–3.33)
≥ 80 1.55 (0.77–3.10) 1.79 (0.73–4.40)
 Marital status Married 1 1
Single or formerly married 1.23 (0.72–2.12) 0.62 (0.25–1.53)
 History of fall No 1 1
Yes 3.36 (1.30–8.68)* 4.61 (1.09–19.57)*
 Arthritis No 1 1
Yes 1.36 (0.80–2.33) 0.82 (0.41–1.62)
 Hypertension No 1 1
Yes 0.62 (0.37–1.01) 1.06 (0.56–1.99)
 Limitation of the IADL No 1 1
Yes 2.40 (1.31–4.39)** 3.41 (1.51–7.71)**
 Limitation of the BADL No 1 1
Yes 2.35 (1.11–4.98)* 4.68 (1.56–14.03)**
 Visual ability No difficulty 1 1
Difficulty 1.40 (0.84–2.33) 1.73 (0.94–3.21)
 Walking ability No difficulty 1 1
Difficulty 2.58 (1.37–4.86)** 4.62 (2.17–9.82)***
 Cognitive function Normal 1 1
Impairment2 2.97 (1.49–5.89)** 1.04 (0.38–2.82)
 Pseudo R2 0.31 0.36

1AOR Adjusted odd ratio; 95% CI = 95% Confidence interval

Adjusted for age, gender, marital status, history of fall, arthritis, hypertension, limitation of the IADL, limitation of the BADL, visual ability, walking ability and cognitive function

2 Cognitive impairment was defined by a score lower than the cut-off score of 23

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001