Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 17;4(4):e00197. doi: 10.1002/pld3.197

Table 4.

Inputs for using measured terahertz spectroscopy peak field ratio (PFR) to predict leaf water status variables, water mass per area (WMA^), relative water content (RWC^), and leaf water potential (Ψleaf^). Predictions were made for each individual leaf during dehydration (WMAleaf^, RWCleaf^ and Ψleaf,leaf^, left column), based on the relationship of water mass per area (WMA) to ln(PFR) for each dehydrating leaf, and from individual leaf values for saturated water mass per leaf area (SWMA) and species‐level mean pressure–volume curve (PV) parameters. Predictions were also tested using species‐level relationships of WMA to ln(PFR) (WMAspecies^, RWCspecies^, and Ψleaf,species^, middle column) and all‐species‐level relationships of WMA to ln(PFR) (WMAall^, RWCall^, and Ψleaf,all^, right column), using species‐level mean values for SWMA and PV parameters

  Individual leaf level prediction Species‐level prediction All‐species‐level prediction
WMA^
WMAleaf^, from WMA ~ ln (PFR) relationship for each leaf WMAspecies^, from WMA ~ ln (PFR) relationship for all leaves of given species WMAall^, from WMA ~ ln (PFR) relationship for all leaves of all species
RWC^

RWCleaf^, from

WMAleaf^ and SWMA of each leaf

RWCspecies^, from

WMAspecies^ and species‐level mean SWMA

RWCall^, from

WMAall^ and species‐level mean SWMA

Ψleaf^

Ψleaf,leaf^, from

RWCleaf^ and species‐level mean P‐V parameters

Ψleaf,species^, from

RWCspecies^ and species‐level mean P‐V parameters

Ψleaf,all^, from

RWCall^ and species‐level mean P‐V parameters