Dumas 2011.
| Methods | This is a prospective, unmasked, randomized controlled clinical trial to assess efficacy of NHFPV compared to NCPAP. | |
| Participants | 46 infants born by caesarian section ≥ 37 GA, ≥ 2000 g with diagnosis of TTN and with a transcutaneous saturation < 90% at 20 m after birth were eligible. 3 infants in each group were excluded before receiving the allocated intervention. | |
| Interventions | Infants were randomized to either NHFPV or NCPAP. | |
| Outcomes | The primary endpoint was the duration of respiratory distress. Secondary endpoints were the duration and level of oxygen supplementation, and the incidence of pneumothorax, and pulmonary infections. |
|
| Notes | ||
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Newborns were assigned using a table of random numbers. |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Sealed opaque envelopes were used. |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | The assigned intervention could not be blinded. |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information provided. |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All outcomes accounted for. |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | The protocol was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00556738 ). |
| Other bias | Low risk | Appears free of other bias. |