Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 17;62(1):53–60. doi: 10.1111/zph.12118

Table 2.

TABV‐ and VEEV‐seropositive bats by location and roost type

No. TABV‐positive (%) No. VEEV‐positive (%)
Location
Urban
Arima 1 (2.1) 2 (18.2)
Couva 1 0 (0.0) 1 (9.1)
Couva 2 0 (0.0) 1 (9.1)
Mt. Hope 0 (0.0) 2 (18.2)
Princes Town 2 (4.3) 0 (0.0)
Tabaquite 3 (6.4) 0 (0.0)
Rural
Aripo savannah 7 (14.9) 1 (9.1)
Cedros 4 (8.5) 0 (0.0)
Erin 10 (21.3) 0 (0.0)
Fyzabad 2 (4.3) 2 (18.2)
Manzanilla 1 (2.1) 0 (0.0)
Morne Diablo 0 (0.0) 1 (9.1)
Moruga 2 (4.3) 0 (0.0)
Rio Claro 2 (4.3) 0 (0.0)
Talparo 7 (14.9) 0 (0.0)
Tamana 0 (0.0) 1 (9.1)
Wallerfield 6 (12.8) 0 (0.0)
Total 47 (100) 11 (100)
Roost type
Bridge 0/2 (0.0) 1/3 (33.3)
Cave 1/13 (7.7) 0/35 (0.0)
House 1/18 (5.6) 3/29 (10.3)
Other building 24/136 (17.6) 3/158 (1.9)
Tree 18/73 (24.7) 4/84 (4.8)
Tunnel 3/66 (4.5) 0/75 (0.0)
Total 47/308 (15.3) 11/384 (2.9)

TABV, Tamana bat virus; VEEV, Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus.

This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.