Table 1.
Type of material sampled | References | Pigs tested | Herds tested | Type of analysis | Distribution of Campylobacter species (in %) among Campylobacter positive samples | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C. coli | C. jejuni | C. lari | |||||
Faeces collected on farm | Schuppers et al., 2005 | 1,280 | 64 | Pool, Cul | 96.3 | 1.2 | – |
Varela et al., 2007a, 2007b | 800 | 80 | Ind, Cul | 99.2 | 0.2 | 0.6 | |
Fosse et al., 2008b | 215 | 6 | Pool, Nb | 95.3 | 4.7 | 0 | |
Rectal contents collected at slaughterhouse | Minvielle et al., 2007 | 250 | 50 | Ind, Nb | 100 | 0 | 0 |
Fosse et al., 2008b | 430 | 6 | Pool, Nb | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
Caecal contents collected at slaughterhouse | Steinhauserova et al., 2005 | 595 | – | Ind, Cul | 92.8 | 7.2 | 0 |
Boes et al., 2005 | 1,244 | 247 | Ind, Cul | 97.5 | 2.5 | 0 | |
Harvey et al., 1999 | 595 | 4 | Ind, Nb | 65.7 | 33.9 | 0.4 |
Ind, individual analysis; Pool, pooled samples analysed; Cul, culture; Nb, culture with numbering; –, lack of data.