. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Nov 12;51(5):1357–1368. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26986

TABLE 2.

Voxelwise Hemodynamic Parameter Results for All Groups

Parameter	1: TBAD	2: AAo repair	3: ET1	4: Controls	P (overall)	P (1&2)	P (1&3)	P (1&4)	P (2&3)	P (2&4)	P (3&4)
Forward Flow FL [ml/cycle]	0.017 ± 0.005	0.034 ± 0.014	0.017	0.117 ± 0.022	0.000^*	0.010^*	0.905	0.000^*	0.022^*	0.000^*	0.007^*
Forward Flow TL [ml/cycle]	0.098 ± 0.021	0.143 ± 0.046	0.130		0.062
Kinetic Energy FL [μJ]	0.089 ± 0.023	0.290 ± 0.131	0.212	0.799 ± 0.269	0.000^*	0.002^*	0.024^*	0.000^*	0.291	0.000^*	0.007^*
Kinetic Energy TL [μJ]	0.713 ± 0.292	1.625 ± 0.825	1.555		0.001^*	0.021^*	0.048^*	0.501	0.885	0.000^*	0.011^*
Reverse Flow FL [ml/cycle]	0.015 ± 0.007	0.022 ± 0.006	0.028	0.010 ± 0.004	0.000^*	0.040^*	0.095	0.034^*	0.456	0.000^*	0.009^*
Reverse Flow TL [ml/cycle]	0.011 ± 0.005	0.018 ± 0.010	0.020		0.007^*	0.180	0.048^*	0.622	0.456	0.004^*	0.018^*
Stasis FL [%]	75.7 ± 10.3	54.4 ± 12.3	50.3	39.2 ± 5.4	0.000^*	0.003^*	0.048^*	0.000^*	1.000	0.000^*	0.383

Results are reported as mean ± standard deviation.

Standard deviation was not included for ET1 group with n = 3 patients.

True lumen (TL) and false lumen (FL) parameters in patients were compared to normal values in controls.

P < 0.05.