Table 3.
Two‐pathogen combinations detected a, b | Regional and total % (n) of two‐pathogen combinations | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Eastc | Midwestd | Weste | Total | |
B. bronchiseptica + CAV‐2 | 6.0 (2) | 0 (0) | 11.1 (3) | 8.1 (5) |
B. bronchiseptica + CDV | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3.7 (1) | 1.6 (1) |
B. bronchiseptica + CPIV | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3.7 (1) | 1.6 (1) |
B. bronchiseptica + M. cynos | 37.1 (13) | 50.0 (1) | 63.0 (17) | 50.0 (31) |
M. cynos + CAV‐2 | 37.1 (13) | 50.0 (1) | 7.4 (2) | 25.8 (16) |
M. cynos + CDV | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 7.4 (2) | 3.2 (2) |
M. cynos + CIV | 2.9 (1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
M. cynos + CPIV | 2.9 (1) | 0 (0) | 3.7 (1) | 3.2 (2) |
M. cynos + CRCoV | 2.9 (1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
CDV + CRCoV | 5.7 (2) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3.2 (2) |
CAV‐2 + CHV | 5.7 (2) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3.2 (2) |
All two‐pathogen combinations | 54.7 (35) | 3.1 (2) | 42.2 (27) | 100.0 (64) |
S. zooepidemicus was not detected in dogs where two CIRD pathogens were involved
CAV‐2 canine adenovirus type 2, CDV canine distemper virus, CHV canine herpesvirus type 1, CIV canine influenza virus, CPIV canine parainfluenza virus, CRCoV canine respiratory coronavirus
East, Florida, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Virginia
Midwest, Indiana
West, Arizona, California, Colorado