Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 21;98(15):5647–5655. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9110

Table 1.

Mean value of kernel weight, length, width and thickness of almonds examined at two different harvest times

T 1 T 2
Cultivar Weight (g) Thickness (mm) Length (mm) Width (mm) Width/length ratio Weight (g) Thickness (mm) Length (mm) Width (mm) Width/length ratio
DLcv 2.20  8.52 27.93 14.73 0.52 1.43 7.35 28.45 15.02 0.53
GEcv 1.94 10.41 22.33 14.94 0.67 1.56 8.46 23.88 15.52 0.65
JPcv 3.14  9.52 35.77 15.57 0.43 1.78 7.19 32.14 15.15 0.47
MAcv 1.78  9.62 20.30 16.26 0.80 1.45 8.54 21.90 16.69 0.76
THcv 1.84  8.76 25.13 13.31 0.52 1.31 7.77 24.22 13.89 0.57
TUcv 1.86  8.70 25.38 15.02 0.59 1.35 7.08 25.07 15.93 0.63
FCcv 2.16 11.09 24.73 15.88 0.64 1.21 7.73 24.88 14.98 0.60
FEcv 2.12  8.89 31.20 14.76 0.47 1.62 8.28 28.74 14.04 0.49
FRcv 2.01  9.26 26.51 14.10 0.53 1.39 6.90 25.94 15.02 0.58
TEcv 1.63  9.61 22.37 13.51 0.60 1.46 9.42 23.48 13.80 0.59

T 1, unripe, but already edible, drupes with green and moist hull; T 2, ripe almonds. DLcv, cv Desmajo Largueta; FCcv, cv Filippo Ceo; FEcv, cv Ferragnès; GEcv, cv Genco; MAcv, cv Marcona; THcv, cv Thompson; TUcv, cv Tuono; TEcv, cv Texas; JPcv, cv Johnston Prolific; FRcv, cv Francolì.