Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 20;40(3):400–406. [Article in Chinese] doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2020.03.19

2.

两种系统不同各个分级甲状腺结节性质构成比、诊断敏感性、特异性及准确性

Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the two TI-RADS classification systems

TI-RADS Category ACR Kwak
TR2 TR3 TR4 TR5 3 4a 4b 4c 5
Se: Sensitivity; Sp: Specificity; PV+: Positive predictive value; PV-: Negative predictive value; LR+: Positive likelihood ratio; LR-: Negative likelihood ratio; DOR: Diagnostic odds ratio; TR: TI-RADS Risk.
Malignant nodules 0 7 23 102 1 6 13 75 37
Ⅲ-Ⅳ 1 6 9 9 2 6 6 8 3
Benign nodules 23 92 57 21 28 113 21 21 10
Total 24 105 89 132 31 125 40 104 50
Malignant rate (%) 0 7.1 28.8 83.0 3.5 5.0 38.2 78.1 78.7
Se 1.000 1.000 0.947 0.773 1.000 0.992 0.947 0.848 0.280
Sp 0 0.119 0.595 0.891 0 0.145 0.731 0.840 0.948
PV+ 0.406 0.437 0.615 0.830 0.406 0.443 0.706 0.783 0.787
PV- - 1.000 0.942 0.851 - 0.966 0.953 0.890 0.658
LR+ 1.000 1.135 2.343 7.101 1.000 1.161 3.515 5.283 5.410
LR- - 0 0.089 0.255 - 0.052 0.073 0.181 0.759
DOR - - 26.328 27.848 - 22.230 48.420 29.265 7.127
Youden index 0 0.119 0.543 0.664 0 0.138 0.678 0.688 0.228
Accuracy 0.406 0.477 0.738 0.843 0.406 0.489 0.818 0.843 0.677