Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 19;12(1):e12027. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12027

TABLE 1.

Studies that followed‐up patients with depressive pseudodementia (organized by patient's age at baseline)

Study n Mean age at baseline (yrs) a Follow‐up (years) Proportion with frank dementia at follow‐up
Tsiouris and Patti (1997) 4 b 44.0 (4.2) 0.5‐3.0 0 (0%)
Sachdev et al. (1990) 8 57.8 (6.1) 7.9 0 (0%) c
Allen (1982) 3 60.7 (4.0) <1.0 0 (0%)
Stoudemire et al. (1995) 8 67.0 (7.6) 4.0 0 (0%)
Reynolds et al. (1987) 8 71.8 (7.7) 0.1 0 (0%)
Pearlson et al. (1989) 15 71.9 (1.5) 2.0 1 (7%)
Rapinesi et al. (2013) 20 72.7 (5.3) 0.2 0 (0%)
Alexopoulous et al. (1993) 23 73.7 (6.8) 2.7 10 (43%)
Bulbena and Berrios (1986) 10 75.4 (7.9) 1.3‐3.9 3 (30%)
McNeil (1999) 13 76.2 (7.1) 3.0 0 (0%) c
Kral and Emery (1989) 44 76.5 (N/R) 4.0‐18.0 39 (89%)
Sáez‐Fonseca et al. (2007) 21 77.6 (N/R) 1.0‐7.0 15 (71%)
Copeland et al. (1992) 6 N/R 3.0 2 (33%)
Reding et al. (1985) 31 N/R 2.5 16 (52%)
Rabins et al. (1984) 18 N/R 2.0 2 (11%)
Wells (1979) 6 N/R <1.0 0 (0%)

Note. See Connors et al. 7 for more details and references. Only patients with depressive pseudodementia are included in this table.

N/R, not reported.

a

Standard deviation is shown in brackets.

b

These four patients also had Down syndrome.

c

Dementia could not be excluded in one patient at follow‐up.