Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 11;202(7):e00692-19. doi: 10.1128/JB.00692-19

TABLE 2.

Analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms using whole-genome sequencing data

Relative position in genomea Gene Refb SNP
Alteration of amino acidc Type of mutationd
WT 1030 WT 1031 WT 1032 WT 1033 EGDe ΔflaA
188308 lmo0184 G T —e — T — 148 E to stop codon Nonsense
189757 lmo0185 C A — — — — — Synonymous
264578 lmo0247 G T T T T T — Synonymous
280225 rpoC C G — — — — 1166 I to M Missense
435968 Intergenic C A A A A A Intergenic Intergenic
929469 rsbU C CTT — — CTT — 245 L to F, frameshift Nonsense
1116367 lmo1081 (rmlA) G T — — — — 241 E to stop codon Nonsense
1442124 Intergenic C A A A A A Intergenic Intergenic
1890030 lmo1814 C A — — A — 82 G to W Missense
2003900 aroF C A — — — — 138 V to F Missense
2207164 lmo2125 T G — — — — 400 Q to P Missense
2734614 lmo2660 C A — — — — 211 G to V Missense
2836724 lmo2757 G — — A — — 354 R to C Missense
2849710 lmo2769 G — — — T — 247 Y to stop codon Nonsense
2943565 Intergenic G T T T T T Intergenic Intergenic
a

The relative locations of the SNPs present in the strains are compared with NC_003210.

b

Ref, nucleotide present at the corresponding relative position in NC_003210.

c

The codons of the coding sequences with SNPs were analyzed by ExPASy translation tool followed by BLAST with the original amino acid sequences.

d

SNPs were categorized as intergenic, synonymous, missense, or nonsense.

e

—, no difference from the reference genome.