Table 3.
Quality appraisal of included articles using Hawker et al. (2002).
| Author/year | Abstract/title | Introduction/aims | Methods/data | Sampling | Data analysis | Ethics/bias | Findings | Transferability/generalisability | Implications/usefulness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eliasson et al. (2011) | Good | Good | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair |
| Guilhot et al. (2013) | Good | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair |
| Chen et al. (2014) | Good | Fair | Fair | Fair | Poor | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair |
| Wu et al. (2015) | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good |
| Bolarinwa et al. (2018) | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | Poor | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair |
| Graffigna et al. (2017) | Fair | Fair | Fair | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair |
| Lim et al. (2017) | Good | Good | Good | Fair | Poor | Fair | Fair | Good | Good |
| Tan et al. (2017) | Good | Good | Good | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | Fair | Good |
| Boons et al. (2018) | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | Poor | Fair | Good | Fair | Good |