Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 19;20:117. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01273-4

Table 2.

Clinical outcomes of SEMS insertion as BTS

Case no. Stent characteristics Technical Success Bridging Success Cause of failure Follow-up treatment ISS (days) OP Name ASOS
SEMS type Length (mm) Diameter (mm)
1 Partially covered 120 20 Yes No Migration 2nd Uncovered SEMS before surgery 12 Loop ileostomy
2 Uncovered 100 24 Yes Yes Surgery 5 Left hemicolectomy, Wedge resection of pancreas body
3 Uncovered 80 20 Yes Yes Surgery 8 Ileostomy
4 Uncovered 100 24 Yes No Insufficient expansion 2nd partially covered SEMS before surgery 15 LAR, Salphingoophorectomy
5 Covered 80 20 Yes Yes Surgery 32 Segmental resection and anastomosis of S-colon Yes
6 Uncovered 100 24 Yes Yes Surgery 33 Lap-loop ileostomy, Palliative
7 Uncovered 100 24 Yes Yes Surgery 16 Cecum-Sigmoid Colon bypass
8 Uncovered 80 24 Yes Yes Surgery 64 Open and closure Yes
9 Uncovered 80 24 Yes Yes Surgery 357 TG, BSO, T-colon segmental resection

SEMS self-expanding metal stent; BTS bridge to surgery; ISS interval from stent insertion to surgery; OP operation; ASOS another site obstruction after surgery; F female; M male; LAR lower anterior resection; TG total gastrectomy; BSO bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy