Table 1.
Authors, Year, Location | Population, Study Period, Patient Groups | POCT | Results |
---|---|---|---|
Brendish et al, 2017,16 UK16, b | A RCT enrolling 720 adults (>18 years) with acute respiratory illness at a large UK hospital during Jan‐July 2015, and Oct 2015‐April 2016. Patients randomly assigned either POCT (n = 362) or routine care (n = 358). | FilmArray Respiratory Panel | Significant, POCT+ vs standard+: 52/57 (91%) vs 24/37 (65%), P = 0.0026 |
Nitsch‐Osuch et al, 2017,17 Polandb | A study comparing treatment of hospitalised children in a paediatric ward during two consecutive influenza seasons: Jan‐Mar 2015, when no RIDT were in use (n = 52), and Jan‐march 2016, when RIDT were implemented into routine practice (n = 63). | bioNexia Influenza A+B | Significant, POCT+ vs standard+: 7/11 (64%) vs 0/15 (0%), P < 0.05 |
Trabattoni et al, 2017,24 Franceb , c | A single centre prospective observational study comparing two diagnostic strategies over 2 months. During Feb 2016 standard laboratory testing was used for diagnosis of influenza (n = 169), and in Mar 2016, a POCT was performed (n = 132). | Alere i Influenza A&B | Not significant, POCT vs standard: 7/132 (5.3%) vs 4/169 (2.4%), P = 0.22 |
Li‐Kim‐Moy et al, 2016,18 Australiab , c | A retrospective review of 364 lab‐confirmed influenza cases presenting at a paediatric ED during Jan‐Dec 2009. Children (<18 y) were diagnosed with influenza by either POCT (n = 236) or standard testing (n = 65). | QuikVue Influenza A+B | Significant, POCT+ vs standard+: 109/236 (46.2%) vs 14/65 (21.5%), P = 0.001 |
Chu et al, 2015,30 USAb | A retrospective study of 350 adult (>18 y) patients at a teaching hospital and medical centre in USA over two influenza seasons, Feb–Mar 2012 and January 2013. The first season was prior to implementation of POCT (n = 175) and in the second season POCT was used systematically (n = 175). | Simplexa Flu A/B & RSV Kit | Significant, pre‐POCT vs post‐POCT: 79/175 (45%) vs 97/175 (55%), P = 0.05 |
González‐Del Vecchio et al, 2015,39 Spainb | Cohort of 217 children and adults influenza positive from a general teaching hospital in Spain over one influenza season, Jan–Mar 2014. Patients were divided into: A‐POCT negative, reference positive (n = 132) or B‐POCT positive (n = 85) | Xpect Flu A&B | Significant, A vs B: 89/132 (67.4%) vs 70/85 (82.3%), P = 0.02 |
Blaschke et al, 2014,19 USAb , d | A retrospective study using data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey over three influenza periods: Jan‐Apr 2007, Oct‐Dec 2008, and Jan‐Apr 2009. 1166 of an estimated 4.9 M eligible ED visits were sampled and examined in three groups: POCT+, POCT−, and Influenza (+) by standard test. | Not specified | Significant, POCT+ vs standard+: 56% vs 19%, P = 0.002Significant, POCT+ vs POCT−: 56% vs 2%, P < 0.0001 |
Lim et al, 2014,23 Koreab | A retrospective review of medical records of 770 children (<15 y) hospitalised with laboratory confirmed influenza between Feb 2004 and June 2007. Different treatment groups were analysed and included patients receiving; oseltamivir only (n = 27), antibiotics‐only (n = 620), antibiotics/oseltamivir combination (n = 67), or standard supportive care (n = 56). | Directigen EZ Flu A+B Test Kit | Significant, oseltamivir only vs antibiotics only, antibiotics/oseltamivir combination, standard supportive care: likelihood of diagnosis by POCT− 22/27 (81.5%) vs 21/620 (3.4%) P < 0.001, 37/67 (55.2%) P = 0.017, 9/56 (16.1%) P < 0.001 |
Suryaprasad et al, 2014,21 USA | A retrospective analysis of patients with ILI who presented to four US healthcare facilities during the May‐Dec 2009 period. A POCT was performed on 290 subjects within 48 h of symptom onset. | BinaxNOW® influenza A & B | Significant, POCT+ vs POCT−: 48/84 (57%) vs 37/206 (18%) (rate ratio 3.3, 95% CI 2.4, 4.6) |
Theocharis et al, 2010,22 Greeceb | An observational study of patients with ILI who received house call visits from a network of doctors in Greece during Jan‐May 2009. 3412 visits were due to ILI, 184 of which had data available from a POCT. | Coris BioConcept Influ A&B Uni‐Strip | Significant, POCT+ vs POCT−: 74/97 (76.2%) vs 1/87 (1.1%), P < 0.01 |
Jennings et al, 2009,20 Germanyb | A study analysing data from a standardised questionnaire that was used by paediatricians in Germany assessing children 1‐12 y with ILI. During the study period Jan‐April 2007, 16 907 patients were evaluated, 15 871 of which received a POCT. | Clearview Exact Influenza A+B | Significant, POCT+ vs standard+: 4618/7658 (60.1%) vs 178/725 (24.6%) |
Falsey et al, 2007,37 USAb | Retrospective analysis of 166 adult (>18 y) hospitalised patients at a hospital in USA over four influenza seasons, Nov‐Apr 1999‐2003. Comparison of POCT positive (n = 86) and POCT negative/no POCT (n = 80) | Directigen Test Kit | Significant, POCT+ vs POCT−/no test: 63/86 (73%) vs 6/80 (8%), P < 0.001 |
Poehling et al, 2006,25 USAb | A RCT enrolling children <5 y presenting with ILI in a Tennessee county over two consecutive influenza seasons (2003‐2004). All subjects (n = 468) had a nasal and throat swab obtained for PCR, and surveillance days were randomised to perform POCT (n = 205). | Quikvue influenza test | Not significant, POCT vs standard: 1/205 (0.5%) vs 0/263 (0%) |
Bonner et al, 2003,31 USAb | An RCT of patients aged 2 mo to 21 y at a children's teaching hospital ED in USA over one influenza season, Jan‐Mar 2002. All patients (n = 391) received a POCT. Of 202 influenza positive patients, the physician was either made aware of the result (n = 96) or unaware (n = 106). | Flu OIA® | Significant, aware vs unaware: 18/96 (18.8%) vs 7/106 (6.6%), P < 0.02 |
Abbreviations: ED, emergency department; ILI, influenza‐like illness; POCT, point of care tests; RCT, randomised controlled trial; RIDT, rapid influenza diagnostic test.
Listed by year of publication, alphabetical.
Also assessed antibiotic prescription (Table 2).
Also assessed ED length of stay (Table 3).
Reported as weighted percentages, exact numbers not available.