Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 20.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychopathol. 2016 Apr 6;29(1):319–329. doi: 10.1017/S0954579416000146

Table 4.

Final Model: Indirect Effect for All Infants, Direct Effect Conditional on Risk Group

15-month RJA (mediator)
Model Coeff (B) SE p
12-month imitation a 0.51 0.26 0.05
Constant - 0.50 0.40 0.22
12-month RJA cov 0.45 0.11 0.00
12-month EV cov 0.04 0.04 0.29
15-month EV cov −0.01 0.01 0.47
R2= .20
F (4, 79) = 5.07, p <.001
18-month expressive vocabulary (outcome)
Model Coeff (B) SE p
12-month imitation c’ (HR) −4.56 5.25 0.39
15-month RJA b 3.20 1.75 0.07
Constant - 5.07 7.50 0.50
12-month RJA cov −0.18 1.92 0.93
12-month EV cov −1.60 0.60 0.01
15-month EV cov 2.55 0.23 0.00
Risk group 28.97 10.57 0.01
Risk group*imitation 17.22 7.94 0.03
R2= .72
F (7, 76) = 27.77, p <.001
Mediation inferences
Group Coeff (B) SE t p LLCI ULCI
Indirect effect - 1.64 1.09 - - 0.24 5.31
Conditional direct effect HR −4.56 5.26 −0.87 0.39 −15.00 5.89
LR 12.67 6.14 2.06 0.04 0.45 24.89

Note: Imitation = motor imitation; EV = expressive vocabulary; RJA=responding to joint attention. LLCI = lower limit of 95% confidence interval; ULCI = upper limit of 95% confidence interval; cov = covariate. Risk group coded as 0 = HR, 1 = LR.