Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 9;10(1):35. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10010035

Table 1.

Clinical data and immunohistochemical profile of six atypical angiofibroma/angiofibroma with sarcomatous transformation and two cellular angiofibroma control cases.

Case No. Gender Age Location Size (cm) Depth Atypical Areas 50/HPF Atypical MF Necrosis (%) Infiltration ER/PR CD34 p16 p53 RB1 FISH Follow-up
1 F 68 pelvis 4 deep CAS with PLPS-like areas 2 no 0 circumscribed 1+ 3+ 3+ negative positive 16 months
2 M 36 hip 9 deep CAS with UPS-like areas 8 no 0 mixed 1+ 3+ 3+ positive positive 12 months
3 M 73 inguinal 3.5 superficial CAS with PLPS-like areas 0 no 0 circumscribed 3+ 3+ 2+ negative positive 10 months
4 F 48 perineum 2.3 superficial CAS with UPS-like areas 4 no 0 circumscribed 3+ 3+ 2+ negative positive 12 months
5 F 25 vulva 4.3 deep ACA 0 no 0 circumscribed 3+ 1+ 2+ negative positive 8 months
6 F 43 vulva 7 deep CAS with PLPS-like areas 6 no 0 circumscribed 3+ 3+ 2+ positive positive 6 months
CA1 M 63 inguinal 7.5 deep 2 no 0 circumscribed 1+ 2+ negative negative positive 12 months
CA2 F 52 vulva 2.2 superficial 0 no 0 circumscribed 1+ 2+ negative negative positive 24 months

Bold letters represent the p53 positive cases. CA: cellular angiofibroma, ACA: atypical angiofibroma, CAS: angiofibroma with sarcomatous transformation, PLPS: pleomorphic liposarcoma, UPS: undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, ER/PR: xxx, FISH: fluorescence in situ hybridization; 1+, 2+, and 3+ indicate mild, moderate, and strong positivity by immunohistochemical stain.