Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 16.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Apr 16;13(4):e008717. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008717

Table 2.

Procedural characteristics of subjects undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) randomized to an acute pre-procedural oral load of colchicine or placebo

Colchicine
(n=206)
Placebo
(n=194)
p-value
Access site, % 0.96
 Radial artery 179 (86.9) 167 (86.1)
 Femoral artery 24 (11.7) 24 (12.4)
 Radial and femoral arteries 3 (1.5) 3 (1.5)
Number of stents deployed 1 [1, 2] 1 [1, 2] 0.56
Total stent length, mm 28 [18, 38] 28 [18, 38] 0.79
Number of inflations 6 [4, 8] 6 [4, 8] 0.68
Multivessel intervention, % 25 (12.1) 21 (10.8) 0.80
Lesion level characteristics (n=258) (n=242)
 Pre-procedural TIMI 0/1 flow, % 13 (5.0) 19 (7.9) 0.95
 Stent diameter, mm2 3.00 [2.50, 3.00] 2.75 [2.50, 3.00] 0.59
 Maximum pressure on last device, atm 20 ± 4 20 ± 5 0.65
 Bifurcation, % 40 (15.5) 36 (14.9) 0.89
 Heavily calcified, % 35 (13.6) 45 (18.6) 0.63
 Tortuous, % 17 (6.6) 25 (10.3) 0.74
 Chronic total occlusion, % 14 (5.4) 11 (4.5) 0.86
 Lesion length >33 mm, % 57 (22.1) 52 (21.5) 0.77
 Thrombus, % 12 (4.7) 9 (3.7) 0.91
 Re-stenosis, % 16 (6.2) 11 (4.5) 0.82
(n=206) (n=194)
Post-procedural TIMI 3 flow, % 202 (98.1%) 193 (99.5%) 0.37
Successful PCI, % 203 (98.5) 190 (97.9) 0.94
Intra-procedural complication, %
 Abrupt closure 0 1 (0.5) 0.49
 Side branch occlusion 4 (1.9) 2 (1.0) 0.69
 Persistent flow reduction 1 (0.5) 3 (1.5) 0.36
 Distal embolus 0 1 (0.5) 0.49
 Major dissection 3 (1.5) 3 (1.5) 0.99
 Coronary perforation 0 1 (0.5) 0.49
 Any complication 8 (3.9) 10 (5.2) 0.71

Continuous data are presented as mean ± standard deviation and compared using two sample t test. Skewed continuous data are presented as median [interquartile range] and compared using Mann-Whitney test. Categorical data are presented as frequency (proportion) and compared using chi-square test, or fisher’s exact test if the cell number is less than 5. For lesion level characteristics, a linear mixed effect model and a logistic mixed effect model were used to account for the effect of individual subjects on continuous and categorical variables, respectively.