Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 9;26:e922739-1–e922739-12. doi: 10.12659/MSM.922739

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate analysis for OS in trainning cohort.

Cetegory Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
P Hazard ratio (95% CI) P
Age (y) <0.001
 <51 Reference
 51–58 1.272 (1.029–1.572) 0.026
 >58 2.032 (1.678–2.462) <0.001
Race 0.003
 White Reference
 Black 1.278 (1.045–1.563) 0.017
 Other* 1.187 (0.918–1.534) 0.190
Year at diagnosis 0.896
 2004–2009
 2010–2015
Grade** <0.001
 Low Reference
 High 2.329 (1.796–3.021) <0.001
Stage <0.001
 I Reference
 II 2.242 (1.836–3.168) <0.001
 III 3.759 (2.878–4.911) <0.001
 IV 4.539 (3.690–5.585) <0.001
Tumor size (mm) <0.001
 <70 Reference
 70–140 1.376 (1.107–1.709) 0.004
 >140 2.029 (1.606–2.564) <0.001
Lymphadenectomy 0.254
 Yes
 No
Surgery type <0.001
 Hysterectomy** Reference
 Pelvic exenteration 0.695 (0.387–1.247) 0.222
 No surgery 2.439 (1.753–3.393) <0.001
Radiotherapy 0.068
 Yes
 No
Chemotherapy <0.001
 Yes Reference
 No 1.280 (1.074–1.526) 0.005

CI – confidence interval.

*

American Indian/Alaskan Native, Asian/Pacific Islander;

**

Low: Grade I (well differentiated) and Grade II (moderately differentiated); High: Grade III (poorly differentiated) and Grade IV (undifferentiated anaplastic);

***

Total/simple/pan/radical hysterectomy with or without removal of adnexa.