Heiselman 1995.
| Methods | RCT | |
| Participants | Number of participants randomised: 105; 46 in the control group and 59 in the metoclopramide group Inclusion criteria: admission to the critical care unit; need for enteral nutrition Did not state whether diabetic patients were included or not |
|
| Interventions |
|
|
| Outcomes | Success rate of post‐pyloric tube placement evaluated by auscultation of the right upper abdominal quadrant and abdominal radiography taken 45 minutes after tube advancement | |
| Notes | Setting: Ohio, USA | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details about randomisation provided |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Concealment of allocation sequence not described |
| Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | No blinding of participants, personnel or outcome assessors |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | There were no withdrawals or dropouts |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | All outcomes reported |
| Other bias | Low risk | Sample size calculation was reported |