Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 7;2015(1):CD003353. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003353.pub2

Kittinger 1987.

Methods RCT
Participants Number of participants randomised: 70
Inclusion criteria: all patients requiring feeding tube placement were considered eligible, including diabetic patients
Exclusion criteria: pregnant in‐patients and intensive care patients
Interventions
  • 35 participants received metoclopramide 10 mg in 2 ml volume intramuscularly

  • 35 participants received 2 ml of diluent as placebo.


Either metoclopramide or placebo was administered immediately after insertion of the feeding tube
Outcomes Success rate of post‐pyloric tube placement evaluated by abdominal radiography 1 hour after insertion of the feeding tube
Notes Setting: North Carolina,USA
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Generation of the allocation sequence: random number table
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Concealment of allocation sequence not described
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double‐blind method: not described
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk There are no withdrawals or dropouts
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes reported
Other bias Unclear risk Sample size calculation was not reported