Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 17;28(2):72–81. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2019.1667045

Table 1.

Diagnostic Accuracy and Reliability Studies of that Sharp-Purser Test.

Author and Year Study Type Subjects Age Sex Setting Imaging Reference Standard Complications
with use of Test
Forrester and Barlas 1999[19] Reliability and validity study cross sectional design 31 patients with RA Mean age 57.5 years; range 29–24 yrs; mean duration of RA was 15 yrs 21 women, 10 men Physical therapy practice Radiographs No
Cattrysse 1997[3] Reliability study 4 examiners and 11 children with Down’s Syndrome Mean age of 9 yrs; age range from 5–14 yrs Sex of subjects unknown; sex of examiners is 50% male/female Physical therapy practice Radiographs No
Montemerani 1994[28] Incidence study with cross-sectional design 183 subjects with RA Mean age ± SD: 33.35 ± 14.72 36 males;
147 females
Physician practice Radiographs/CT scan No
Katayama 1990[25] Validity study with cross-sectional design 104 subjects with RA Mean age of 53.3 yrs; age range 28 to 76 yrs 25 males;
79 females
Physician practice Radiographs/CT scan No
Stevens 1971[12] Incidence study with cross-sectional design 100 subjects with RA Mean age of 54.2 yrs; age range from 21–75 yrs 27 males; 73 females Physician practice Radiographs No
Mathews 1969[13] Incidence study with case-control study design 76 subjects with RA; 28 healthy control subjects Under 50 yrs: 18
50–59 yrs: 24
60–69 yrs: 24
Over 70 yrs: 10
26 males;
50 females
Physician practice Radiographs No
Uitvlugt 1988[20] Validity study with cross-sectional design 123 subjects with RA NR NR Physician practice Radiographs No

Yrs: years; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; SD: standard deviation; CT scan: computed tomography scan; NR: not reported