Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD003424. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003424.pub4
Date Event Description
10 July 2014 New search has been performed A search of the Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Trials Register identified a single new reference which has been included in the review (DiMango 2014).
10 July 2014 New citation required but conclusions have not changed Although a single new abstract was identified which was eligible for inclusion in the review, the limited narrative information provided has not led to any change in the conclusions of this review.
16 February 2012 New citation required but conclusions have not changed No new references have been added to the review at this update.
16 February 2012 New search has been performed A search of the Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register did not identify any references potentially eligible for inclusion in this review.
15 April 2010 New search has been performed A search of the Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register identified two studies potentially eligible for inclusion in the review. One of these has been included (Lubin 1979) and the other has been excluded (Tsang 1994).
13 May 2009 Amended No changes ‐ republished to fix technical problem.
16 June 2008 Amended Converted to new review format.
13 June 2008 New search has been performed A search of the Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register did not identify any references potentially eligible for inclusion in this review.
22 August 2007 Amended The plain language summary has been re‐drafted in light of the current guidance from The Cochrane Collaboration.
22 August 2007 New search has been performed A search of the Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trial's Register did not identify any new references which were eligible for inclusion in this review.
16 August 2006 New search has been performed A search of the Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trial's Register did not identify any new references which were eligible for inclusion in this review.
17 August 2005 Amended It was decided by the review authors to remove the data analysis that was previously included within the review. It was felt that this analysis was inappropriate and it would be of more benefit to the reader to report the individual trial results narratively under the relevant outcomes.
17 August 2005 New search has been performed Two trials have been included within the review (Durie 1980; Proesmans 2003).
Three trials have been added to the 'Excluded studies' section of the review (Ansaldi‐Balocco 1988; Gow 1981; Stead 1988).
24 February 2004 New search has been performed A search found two new trials for inclusion in the review (Chung 2000; Francisco 2002). However, we were not able to include any new data.