Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 30;5(3):e002039. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002039

Table 2.

Associations of candidate variables (to be entered into path analysis) with EDS above threshold score at baseline and follow-up survey

Candidate predictor variables Baseline survey Follow-up survey
Total number Satisfied EDS threshold ≥13.0 Total number Satisfied EDS threshold ≥13.0
Number Row % Number Row %
All women 1292 249 19.3 1292 163 12.6
Age
<25 years 509 109 21.4 314 46 14.6
25–29 466 94 20.2 482 69 14.3
≥30 years 317 46 14.5 496 48 9.7
χ2 test: p values p=0.042 p=0.042
IPV
No or low 584 69 11.8 499 30 6.0
Severe psychological abuse alone 386 71 18.4 295 35 11.9
Physical and severe psychological abuse 322 109 33.9 498 98 19.7
χ2 test: p values p<0.001 p<0.001
Poverty index*
No poverty/social disadvantage 322 45 14 311 20 6.4
Moderate poverty/social disadvantage 885 179 20.2 907 114 12.6
Severe poverty/social disadvantage 85 25 29.4 74 29 39.2
χ2 test: p values p=0.003 p<0.001
Maternal ill health (follow-up)
No physical symptoms 1156 135 11.7
One or more physical symptoms 136 28 20.6
χ2 test: p values p=0.003
Child ill health (follow-up)
No symptoms 1099 122 11.1
Presence of symptoms 193 41 21.2
χ2 test: p values p<0.001
EDS at baseline
EDS: threshold <13.0 1043 NA 105 10.1
EDS: threshold ≥13.0 249 58 22.3
χ2 test: p values p<0.001
Mean TEs at baseline
EDS: threshold <13.0 (mean, SD) 1043 5.1 (3.2) 5.2 (3.3)
EDS: threshold ≥13.0 (mean, SD) 249 6.6 (3.5) 6.3 (3.9)
t-test: p values p<0.001 p<0.001

*Poverty index at baseline/follow-up based on items inquiring into education (none to high-school level=1; technical/university level=0), employment (unemployed=1; employed=0) and ongoing economic hardship (no economic hardship=0; any economic hardship=1), scored 0–3 (0=no poverty; 1=moderate poverty; 2,3=severe poverty), a higher score representing greater ongoing economic hardship. Economic hardship score generated by adding six items related to ongoing financial stressors, each of them scored ‘0’ for ‘no economic hardship at all’ and ‘1’ for ‘any economic hardship’. Total score was then dichotomised by assigning of ‘0’ for ‘no economic hardship at all’ and ‘1’ for ‘any economic hardship’.

EDS, Edinburgh Depression Scale; IPV, intimate partner violence; NA, not applicable; TE, traumatic effect.