Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 30;5(3):e002039. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002039

Table 3.

Path model: standardised direct and indirect effects of age, poverty, family conflict, total conflict-related trauma events, IPV leading to depressive symptoms and functional impairment, at baseline and follow-up

Candidate predictor variables Depressive symptoms at baseline Depressive symptoms at follow-up Functional impairment at follow-up
Coefficient (β) P values Coefficient (β) P values Coefficient (β) P values
Direct significant effects*
Baseline survey
Age at baseline −0.06 p=0.016
Poverty index at baseline 0.10 p<0.001
Total traumatic event counts at baseline 0.23 p<0.001 0.07 p=0.006 (0.08) p<0.001
IPV at baseline 0.26 p<0.001
Depressive symptoms at baseline (total score) 0.20 p<0.001 0.06 p=0.023
Follow-up survey
Poverty index 0.14 p<0.001 0.07 p=0.009
IPV 0.14 p<0.001 (0.05) p<0.001
Maternal ill health during pregnancy (0.03) p<0.001 0.14 p<0.001
Child ill health 0.08 p=0.001 (0.03) p=0.002
Depressive symptoms at follow-up (total score) NA 0.35 p<0.001
Model summary Values
χ2 test of model fit 23.92; df=24; p=0.466
RMSEA (90% CI of RMSEA) 0.000 (0.000–0.022)
CFI 1.00
TLI 1.00
SRMR 0.014

All the variables included in the analyses are based on observed data. Only significant estimates are included in the table.

*Indirect significant effects are presented inside bracket in italics.

CFI, Comparative Fit Index; IPV, intimate partner violence; NA, not applicable; RMSEA, Root mean square error of approximation; SRMR, standardised root mean square residual; TLI, Tucker–Lewis Index.