Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 20;2020(4):CD012395. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012395.pub2

Comparison 3. Patisiran versus placebo in TTR‐FAP.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Disability due to FAP progression (expressed as the change from baseline in the R‐ODS), at 18 months 1 225 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 8.9 [7.00, 10.80]
2 Severity of peripheral neuropathy (expressed as the change from baseline in the mNIS+7Alnylam), at 18 months 1 225 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐33.99 [‐39.86, ‐28.12]
3 Change in mBMI, at 18 months 1 225 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 115.7 [82.40, 149.00]
4 Quality of life (change in Norfolk QOL‐DN total score), at 18 months 1 225 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐21.1 [‐27.20, ‐15.00]
5 Number of participants who died during the trial 1 225 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.61 [0.21, 1.74]
6 Number of participants experiencing at least one adverse event 1 225 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.99 [0.95, 1.04]
7 Number of participant dropouts due to adverse events (data from published paper ‐ see text) 1 225 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.33 [0.13, 0.82]
8 Number of participants experiencing at least one severe adverse event 1 225 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.91 [0.64, 1.28]