Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 29;10(3):e034189. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034189

Table 4.

Association between prefrailty, frailty and instrumental activities of daily living limitations: unadjusted, age-adjusted and sex-adjusted and multivariable-adjusted zero-inflated Poisson regression results

Models Logistic section, OR (95% CI)* Poisson section, RR (95% CI)†
Frailty Prefrailty Frailty Prefrailty
Model 1: unadjusted 0.06 (0.02 to 0.24) 0.47 (0.18 to 1.21) 5.93 (2.99 to 11.75) 1.81 (0.87 to 3.74)
Model 2: model 1+sex and age 0.10 (0.02 to 0.47) 0.44 (0.15 to 1.31) 3.92 (2.21 to 6.95) 1.29 (0.73 to 2.30)
Model 3: model 2+longest held occupation 0.11 (0.02 to 0.56) 0.46 (0.16 to 1.32) 3.94 (2.11 to 7.36) 1.30 (0.70 to 2.43)
Model 4: model 3+social support 0.13 (0.02 to 0.79) 0.49 (0.15 to 1.63) 4.35 (2.31 to 8.22) 1.36 (0.73 to 2.53)
Model 5: model 4+multimorbidity 0.12 (0.02 to 0.69) 0.44 (0.14 to 1.40) 4.21 (2.26 to 7.83) 1.30 (0.71 to 2.39)
Model 6: model 5+self-perceived vision ability 0.11 (0.02 to 0.68) 0.34 (0.05 to 2.25) 4.13 (2.25 to 7.59) 1.22 (0.68 to 2.20)
Model 7: model 6+self-perceived hearing ability 0.11 (0.02 to 0.59) 0.33 (0.06 to 1.84) 4.16 (2.27 to 7.60) 1.21 (0.67 to 2.16)

Statistically significant estimates (at the 5% level) are displayed in bold.

*Logistic section of the regression model estimates the log-odds of belonging to the ‘sure-zero’/‘not-at-risk’ class.

†Poisson section of the regression model estimates the count of IADL limitations for those estimated to belong to the ‘non-sure zero’/‘at risk’ latent class.

OR, odds ratio; RR, rate ratio.