Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 9;57(5):1647–1655. doi: 10.1007/s13197-019-04197-4

Table 2.

Antifungal activity (AI) of ZEO, CEO, and SEO against Botrytis cinerea and Rhizopus stolonifer and the radial growth (RG) of fungal pathogens

Components Concentration (μL/L) Botrytis cinerea Rhizopus stolonifer
RGa (mm) AIb (%) RG (mm) AI (%)
Control 0 90 ± 0.00a 0.00h 90 ± 0.00a 0.00g
ZEO 75 79.33 ± 1.53d 11.85e 74.33 ± 0.58ab 17.41ef
150 0h 100a 61.33 ± 4.16d 31.85d
300 0h 100a 21.33 ± 1.80f 76.29b
600 0h 100a 0g 100a
1200 0h 100a 0g 100a
CEO 75 86.90 ± 0.46b 3.50g 65.67 ± 3.03cd 27.04de
150 9.33 ± 1.15g 89.63b 39.67 ± 1.51e 55.92c
300 0h 100a 0g 100a
600 0h 100a 0g 100a
1200 0h 100a 0g 100a
SEO 75 83.32 ± 0.35c 7.43f 78.60 ± 0.23b 12.67f
150 46.33 ± 3.51e 48.52d 67.20 ± 0.69cd 25.33de
300 16.83 ± 1.04f 81.25c 31.33 ± 1.53e 65.19c
600 0h 100a 0g 100a
1200 0h 100a 0g 100a

Mean values followed by the same letters (i.e. a, b, c, etc.) are not significantly different according to Tukey test (p < 0.05)

aRadial growth of fungus pathogen

bAntifungal index