Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 21;34(4):e23132. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23132

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate analyses for prognostic factors of DFS after curative resection for stage I‐III RCC and LCRC

Factors Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR 95%CI P HR 95%CI P
RCC            
Age (≥64 vs <64 y) 1.36 0.75‐2.48 .315      
Gender (male vs female) 1.21 0.66‐2.19 .540      
T stage (T3‐4 vs T1‐2) 3.48 1.08‐11.25 .037 2.07 0.62‐6.88 .235
N stage (N1‐2 vs N0) 2.16 1.17‐3.96 .013 1.98 1.09‐3.60 .036
Differentiation (poor vs others) 2.31 1.27‐4.18 .006 2.02 1.10‐3.72 .024
Lymphovascular invasion 2.51 1.34‐4.69 .004 2.09 1.07‐4.10 .031
Perineural invasion 1.63 0.82‐3.23 .163      
No. of lymph node (≥12 vs <12) 1.33 0.59‐2.98 .495      
CEA(≥4.25 ng/mL vs <4.25 ng/mL) 2.07 1.12‐3.83 .021 1.95 1.02‐3.72 .044
NLR (≥2.3 vs <2.3) 2.14 1.08‐4.24 .029 2.32 1.15‐4.66 .018
PLR (≥145.2 vs <145.2) 2.31 1.11‐4.81 .025 2.43 1.09‐5.42 .030
LMR (<3.5 vs ≥3.5) 2.25 1.18‐4.31 .014 2.16 1.11‐4.20 .024
LCRC            
Age (≥64 vs <64 y) 1.47 0.85‐2.55 .171      
Gender (male vs female) 1.49 0.82‐2.69 .187      
T stage (T3‐4 vs T1‐2) 5.42 1.69‐17.40 .005 5.16 1.58‐16.82 .007
N stage (N1‐2 vs N0) 1.96 1.13‐3.41 .017 1.85 1.06‐3.23 .031
Differentiation (poor vs others) 2.94 1.67‐5.20 <.001 1.96 1.07‐3.60 .030
Lymphovascular invasion 3.34 1.89‐5.91 <.001 3.54 1.92‐6.52 <.001
Perineural invasion 1.37 0.72‐2.62 .343      
No. of lymph node (≥12 vs <12) 1.40 0.73‐2.68 .310      
CEA(≥4.25 ng/mL vs <4.25 ng/mL) 1.90 1.08‐3.34 .025 2.45 1.35‐4.45 .003
NLR (≥2.3 vs <2.3) 2.08 1.19‐3.63 .010 1.60 0.89‐2.87 .115
PLR (≥145.2 vs <145.2) 2.28 1.31‐3.97 .004 2.84 1.57‐5.15 .001
LMR (<3.5 vs ≥3.5) 1.58 0.91‐2.74 .104      

Abbreviations: 95%CI, 95% confidential interval; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; DFS, disease‐free survival; HR, hazard ratio; LMR, lymphocyte‐monocyte ratio; NLR, neutrophil‐lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet‐lymphocyte ratio; RCRC, right‐sided colon cancer.