Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 20;34(4):e23153. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23153

Table 2.

Correlation between clinicopathological features and PLR, HPR, CEA in rectal cancer

  N PLR P HPR P CEA P
Gender
Male 140 130.89 (96.00, 171.23) .770 0.55 (0.44, 0.64) .000 2.86 (1.68, 4.53) .506
Female 95 128.16 (103.75, 175.37) 0.47 (0.38, 0.55) 2.74 (1.45, 4.83)
Tumor invasion (T stage)
T1 + T2 101 121.29 (93.18, 160.96) .064 0.52 (0.44, 0.61) .055 2.66 (1.68, 3.90) .047
T3 + T4 134 134.80 (98.82,185.33) 0.48 (0.38, 0.59) 3.06 (1.57, 5.91)
Lymph node metastasis (N stage)
N0 146 125.16 (96.13, 160.30) .036 0.52 (0.44, 0.63) .010 2.74 (1.57, 4.25) 0.359
N1‐N3 89 141.78 (98.24, 196.68) 0.47 (0.37, 0.57) 2.95 (1.64, 5.60)
Distant metastasis (M stage)
M0 231 129.56 (96.60, 171.23)   0.51 (0.42, 0.60)   2.79 (1.59, 4.56)  
M1 4 167.18 (92.50, 286.05) 0.43 (0.29, 0.69) 5.14 (1.75, 10.53)
Tumor size (cm)
<5 128 127.80 (96.34, 161.69) .398 0.51 (0.43, 0.61) .108 2.62 (1.54, 3.95) .021
≥5 107 130.83 (98.35, 195.03) 0.50 (0.38, 0.58) 3.18 (1.67, 6.52)
Stage
I + II 161 123.87 (94.50, 160.96) .005 0.53 (0.44, 0.61) .000 2.74 (1.60, 4.26) .317
III + IV 74 147.30 (108.62, 209.56) 0.45 (0.37, 0.57) 3.07 (1.57, 5.66)