Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. 2020 Apr 6;8(4):e17258. doi: 10.2196/17258

Table 7.

Results of the hypotheses testing.

Indicator (abbreviation)	Model I		Model II		Model III			Hypothesis test
	Path coefficient	P value	Path coefficient	P value		Path coefficient	P value
Perceived information quality (PIQ)	.250	.001	.196	.003		.209	.003	Hypothesis 1 was supported
Perceived system quality (PSQ)	.205	.02	.179	.03		.178	.03	Hypothesis 2 was supported
Social media influence (SMI)	.302	<.001	.261	<.001		.254	<.001	Hypothesis 3 was supported
Attitude (AT)	.558	<.001	.558	<.001		.558	<.001	Hypothesis 5 was supported
Health consciousness (HC)	N/A^a	N/A	.294	<.001		.269	<.001	N/A
PIQ × HC	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A		.101	.17	Hypothesis 4a was not supported
PSQ × HC	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A		.044	.56	Hypothesis 4b was not supported
SMI × HC	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A		.124	.04	Hypothesis 4c was reverse supported
Age	.054	.25	.055	.24		.055	.25	N/A
Gender	.028	.62	.028	.60		.029	.60	N/A
Education	-.090	.28	.013	.83		.013	.83	N/A
Work	.013	.83	.090	.28		.090	.28	N/A
R²	.333	N/A	.411	N/A		.434	N/A	N/A
R² adjusted	.325	N/A	.401	N/A		.418	N/A	N/A

^aNot applicable.