Table 4.
Regression models for MetS scores in Black and White men.
| Statistic | Black men | White men | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-reported C | Parent-rated C | Self-reported C | Parent-rated C | |
| Overall model statistics and Adjusted R2 | F(4, 109)=3.66, p=.008 | F(4, 109)=0.52, p=.72 | F(4, 76)=0.30, p=.88 | F(4, 76)=0.55, p=.70 |
| .0860 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Intercept |
b=−0.03 [−0.15, 0.09] β=0, p=.63 |
b=−0.03 [−0.17, 0.11] β=0, p=.70 |
b=0.06 [−0.08, 0.20] β=0, p=.40 |
b=0.07 [−0.07, 0.21] β=0, p=.29 |
| Conscientiousness |
b=0.60 [−0.04, 1.25] β=0.18, p=.066 |
b=−0.14 [−0.74, 0.45] β=−0.06, p=.63 |
b=0.18 [−0.36, 0.73] β=0.08, p=.50 |
b=0.07 [−0.44, 0.57] β=0.03, p=.79 |
| Risk |
b=0.06 [−0.06, 0.17] β=0.09, p=.35 |
b=0.05 [−0.08, 0.17] β=0.07, p=.45 |
b=−0.04 [−0.18, 0.09] β=−0.07, p=.53 |
b=−0.04 [−0.18, 0.09] β=−0.07, p=.55 |
| SES |
b=0.01 [−0.003, 0.01] β=0.11, p=.23 |
b=0.005 [−0.01, 0.01] β=0.10, p=.34 |
b=−0.004 [−0.01, 0.01] β=−0.09, p=.45 |
b=0.005 [−0.01, 0.01] β=−0.06, p=.62 |
| Conscientiousness × SES |
b=−0.05 [−0.09, −0.01] β=−0.22, p=.022 |
b=0.01 [−0.03, 0.05] β=0.04, p=.74 |
b=−0.003 [−0.04, 0.03] β=−0.02, p=.88 |
b=−0.02 [−0.06, 0.02] β=−0.13, p=.25 |
Note. C=conscientiousness. SES=Hollingshead socioeconomic status index. MetS=Metabolic syndrome score. For each variable, betas and their 95% confidence intervals are presented, as well as standardized betas and associated p values. Models for parent-rated conscientiousness in Black men and self-reported and parent-rated conscientiousness in White men are non-significant and presented for comparison.