Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychosom Med. 2019 May;81(4):341–351. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000688

Table 4.

Regression models for MetS scores in Black and White men.

Statistic Black men White men
Self-reported C Parent-rated C Self-reported C Parent-rated C
Overall model statistics and Adjusted R2 F(4, 109)=3.66, p=.008 F(4, 109)=0.52, p=.72 F(4, 76)=0.30, p=.88 F(4, 76)=0.55, p=.70
.0860 0 0 0
Intercept b=−0.03 [−0.15, 0.09]
β=0, p=.63
b=−0.03 [−0.17, 0.11]
β=0, p=.70
b=0.06 [−0.08, 0.20]
β=0, p=.40
b=0.07 [−0.07, 0.21]
β=0, p=.29
Conscientiousness b=0.60 [−0.04, 1.25]
β=0.18, p=.066
b=−0.14 [−0.74, 0.45]
β=−0.06, p=.63
b=0.18 [−0.36, 0.73]
β=0.08, p=.50
b=0.07 [−0.44, 0.57]
β=0.03, p=.79
Risk b=0.06 [−0.06, 0.17]
β=0.09, p=.35
b=0.05 [−0.08, 0.17]
β=0.07, p=.45
b=−0.04 [−0.18, 0.09]
β=−0.07, p=.53
b=−0.04 [−0.18, 0.09]
β=−0.07, p=.55
SES b=0.01 [−0.003, 0.01]
β=0.11, p=.23
b=0.005 [−0.01, 0.01]
β=0.10, p=.34
b=−0.004 [−0.01, 0.01]
β=−0.09, p=.45
b=0.005 [−0.01, 0.01]
β=−0.06, p=.62
Conscientiousness × SES b=−0.05 [−0.09, −0.01]
β=−0.22, p=.022
b=0.01 [−0.03, 0.05]
β=0.04, p=.74
b=−0.003 [−0.04, 0.03]
β=−0.02, p=.88
b=−0.02 [−0.06, 0.02]
β=−0.13, p=.25

Note. C=conscientiousness. SES=Hollingshead socioeconomic status index. MetS=Metabolic syndrome score. For each variable, betas and their 95% confidence intervals are presented, as well as standardized betas and associated p values. Models for parent-rated conscientiousness in Black men and self-reported and parent-rated conscientiousness in White men are non-significant and presented for comparison.