Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 20;20:120. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02033-4

Table 4.

Hierarchical linear regression analyses showing adjusted associations with scores on the study approach scales

Independent variables Deep approach Strategic approach Surface approach
Sociodemographic variables β p β p β p
 Age 0.13 < 0.05 0.01 0.90 −0.12 0.07
 Sex −0.07 0.32 0.18 < 0.05 0.02 0.73
 Time on independent study 0.10 0.13 0.23 < 0.01 − 0.01 0.82
 Priority line of study −0.02 0.81 0.07 0.34 −0.18 < 0.01
 Prior higher education 0.16 < 0.05 0.01 0.86 −0.02 0.79
Explained variance 6.2% < 0.05 7.7% < 0.05 7.5% < 0.05
Learning environment
 Clear goals and standards −0.13 0.10 0.14 0.09 −0.16 < 0.05
 Student autonomy 0.00 > 0.99 0.12 0.18 0.15 0.06
 Good teaching 0.08 0.39 −0.01 0.92 0.02 0.85
 Appropriate workload −0.10 0.17 0.07 0.39 −0.42 < 0.001
 Generic skills 0.51 < 0.001 0.18 < 0.05 −0.24 < 0.01
R2change 24.5% < 0.001 13.2% < 0.001 29.4% < 0.001
Explained variance 30.7% < 0.001 20.9% < 0.001 36.9% < 0.001

Table content is standardized beta (β) values with corresponding significance (p) levels. The variable ‘Time on independent study’ is average number of hours spent on independent studying during a typical week. Men were coded ‘0’ and women ‘1’, i.e., women had higher scores on the strategic approach to studying