Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 3;23(3):146–156. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyz072

Table 2.

Mood and quality-of-life outcome measures

Baseline Week 2 Week 4 Condition Time Time × Condition
Mood assessments–mean (n, SEM) Sham Active Sham Active Sham Active F P F P F P
Per-protocol analysis
MADRS 29.1 (33, 0.8) 28.9 (32, 0.8) 24.4 (33, 1.0) 24.8 (32, 1.1) 22.1 (34, 1.2) 23.7 (32, 1.3) 0.24 .630 41.73 <.001 0.82 .445
BDI-II 32.6 (31, 1.7) 33.2 (28, 1.8) 25.2 (34, 1.9) 27.2 (32, 2.0) 22.1 (32, 1.9) 24.9 (31, 2.0) 0.72 .399 24.56 <.001 0.46 .762
CGI-I 3.5 (33, 0.1) 3.6 (32, 0.1) 3.1 (33, 0.1) 3.4 (32, 0.1) 2.24 .140 12.69 <.001 2.10 .153
Q-LES-SF 32.4 (34, 1.9) 36.0 (30, 2.1) 43.5 (32, 2.8) 43.9 (31, 2.9) 0.45 .503 31.67 <.001 0.84 .362
Intention-to-treat analysis
MADRS 29.1 (34, 0.8) 29.0 (34, 0.8) 24.4 (33, 1.0) 24.8 (34, 1.1) 22.1 (34, 1.2) 23.7 (32 1.3) 0.29 .593 43.09 <.001 0.77 .467
BDI-II 32.4 (32, 1.6) 33.4 (30, 1.7) 24.9 (34, 1.9) 27.1 (34, 2.0) 21.9 (32, 1.9) 25.1 (31, 2.0) 1.07 .306 25.07 <.001 0.58 .678
CGI-I 3.5 (33, 0.1) 3.6 (34, 0.1) 3.1 (33, 0.1) 3.4 (32, 0.1) 2.60 .112 13.07 <.001 1.98 .165
Q-LES-SF 32.5 (35, 1.8) 35.8 (32, 2.0) 43.6 (32, 2.8) 43.8 (31, 2.9) 0.37 .545 32.00 <.001 0.80 .376

Abbreviations: BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory; CGI-I, Clinician Global Impression Improvement scale, a 7-point clinician-rated scale ranked from 1-very much improved to 7-very much worse; MADRS, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale; MERM, mixed-effects repeated measures; Q-LES-SF, Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire—Short Form.

Estimated marginal means and results from MERM analyses during the sham-controlled phase. MERM analyses were performed including the following covariates: Maudsley staging method total score as a measure of treatment resistance, and antidepressant use. Statistically significant P values (< .05) are highlighted in bold.