Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Jan 14;104(Pt A):106644. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106644

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Comparison of co-activated networks between Meta-Analytic Connectivity Model (MACM) and rs-fMRI. Subject elliptical ROIs were marked in green color. Rs-fMRI connectivity one sample t-test showed significant effect in bilateral frontal gyri and temporal gyri, t(80)=3.67, p<0.001. Meta-Analytic Connecitivity Models (MACM) reported Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) scores significant at cluster-level (<0.001) and False Discovery Rate (p<0.05) thresholds. These MACM-defined areas mirror those reported by rs-fMRI. Patient 1 is shown at MNI152 x,y,z slices (−50,32,24); Patient 2 is shown at (−49,28,30); Patient 3 at (−53,21,−5).