Table 3.
Independent associations with cracked tooth being recommended for restoration versus monitoring1
Characteristic | Odds Ratio | 95% Confidence Interval | P2 |
---|---|---|---|
Caries present | 67.9 | 37.6 to 122.6 | <.001 |
Biting pain | 7.3 | 5.2 to 10.2 | <.001 |
Evidence on radiograph | 4.8 | 2.6 to 8.8 | <.001 |
Spontaneous pain | 2.9 | 2.0 to 4.0 | <.001 |
Cold pain | 1.7 | 1.4 to 2.2 | <.001 |
Dental insurance | 1.3 | 1.1 to 1.6 | .006 |
Has a crack that: | |||
Is detectable with explorer | 1.6 | 1.2 to 2.0 | <.001 |
Blocks trans-illuminated light | 1.4 | 1.1 to 1.8 | .019 |
Connects with restoration | 1.4 | 1.1 to 1.8 | .005 |
Horizontal direction | 1.3 | 1.0 to 1.6 | .024 |
Teeth recommended for nonsurgical treatments (n=11), endodontics only (n=9) or extraction (n=2) are excluded
From generalize estimating equations adjusting for clustering within practice using stepwise regression, retaining if P<.05