Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 22;269:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2019.03.013

Table 2.

Comparison of Conventional and Molecular Methods.

Conventional Molecular p
Variables Assaysa Assay value
No. of detectable viruses 9 14
No. of NPA tested 165 165
No. (%) of positive NPA 114 (69.1) 158 (95.8) <0.001d
No. of virus detected 114 213 <0.001e
No. of extra virus detected 0 92
No. of samples with co-infections 0 46 (27.9)



No. of positive NPA by virus types
1. Conventional viruses 94 (56.9) 146 (88.5)
RSV 71 (43.0) 83 (50.3) <0.001 d
HMPV 11 (6.7) 16 (9.7) 0.062 d
IFV-A 3 (1.8) 15 (9.1) <0.001 d
IFV-B 0 0
PIV1 1 (0.6) 1 (0.6)
PIV2 2 (1.2) 3 (1.8)
PIV3 1 (0.6) 4 (2.4)
HAdV 5 (3.0) 24 (14.5) <0.001 d



2. Unconventional viruses 27 (16.4) 67 (41.0)
PIV4 NA 0
HRV 27 (16.4) 54 (32.7) <0.001 d
HEV NA 3 (1.8)
HCOV OC43 NA 4 (2.4)
HCOV 229E NA 0
HBoV NA 6 (3.6)

aincluding DFA and SVC and conventional cell culture; NA: not available; b No of positive samples detected by conventional but not by molecular assay; cNo of positive samples detected by molecular but not immunological assay;d McNemar test; e Paired-samples t-test.