Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 21;19(4):401–411. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.04.005

Table 1.

Potential fractionation options for gynecologic, breast, and prostate brachytherapy

Disease site Dose per fraction, Gy Fx, # EQD2 (+45 Gy EBRT, α/β = 10) Author/Reference
Cervical Cancer
 Point A based 8 3 80.3 Souhami et al. (51)
Phan et al. (62)
Rao et al. (54)
7 4 83.9 ABS Consensus (63)
ABS Task Group Report (50)
6 5 84.3
5.5 5 79.8
5 6 81.8
 HDR interstitial (1 insertion) 5–6 5 (BID) 75–84
 HDR interstitial (2 or 4 insertions) 7 4 83.9
Uterine Cancer
 Vaginal cuff HDR monotherapy 7 Gy at 0.5 cm 3 57.8 (surface dose) ABS Task Group Report (57)
PORTEC-2 (16)
5.5 Gy at 0.5 cm 4 54.2 (surface dose) ABS Task Group Report (50)
5 Gy at 0.5 cm 5 58.9 (surface dose) Jolly et al. (64)
ABS Task Group Report (57)
8.5 Gy at surface 4 52.4 (surface dose) MacLeod et al. (65)
6 Gy at surface 5 40 (surface dose) ABS Task Group Report (50)
4 Gy at surface 6 28 (surface dose) Townamchai et al. (66)
 Vaginal cuff HDR boost 6 Gy at surface 2 60.3 RTOG 0921 (67)
RTOG 0418 (68)
ABS Task Group Report (57)
6 Gy at surface 3 68.3
 Inoperable Stage I
HDR monotherapy
8.5 Gy 4 52.4 (no EBRT) ABS Task Group Report (57)
7.3 5 52.6 (no EBRT)
 Inoperable Stage I
HDR boost + EBRT
8.5 2 70.5
 Inoperable Sstage I
HDR boost + EBRT
6.5 3 71.1
 Inoperable Stage I
HDR boost + EBRT (50.4 Gy)
6 2 65.6
Breast Cancer
 HDR accelerated partial breast irradiation 3.4–4.0 8–10 (BID) 42-45 (α/β = 4–5) RTOG 9517 (58)
Strnad et al. (59)
7.5 3 Khan et al. (69)
Prostate Cancer
 HDR monotherapy 13.5 2 104.6 (α/β = 2) Morton et al. (60)
 LDR monotherapy 1 NCCN Prostate CPG (61)
 I-125 145
 Pd-103 125
 Cs-131 115
 HDR boost (EBRT 37.5 Gy/15 fx) 15 1 105.9 (α/β = 2) Martell et al. (70)
 HDR boost (EBRT 45–50.4 Gy) 10.75 2 ∼113 (α/β = 2) NCCN Prostate CPG (61)
 LDR boost 1 NCCN Prostate CPG (61)
 I-125 110–115
 Pd-103 90–100
 Cs-131 85

ABS = the American Brachytherapy Society; LDR = low-dose-rate; EBRT = external beam radiation therapy; HDR = high-dose-rate.

Fractionation options are in alignment with ABS recommendations, and from published studies/series. Although multiple fractionation options exist, in the setting of COVID-19, priority should be given to shorter treatment courses (where appropriate) to minimize patient and health care worker exposure and resource utilization.