Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 27;142(8):081003. doi: 10.1115/1.4045906

Fig. 3.

(a) Comparison of model and experimental TF kinematics for the lunge activity: experiment and calibrated model predictions (RMS difference of TF flexion–extension <3 deg, varus–valgus <2.5 deg, internal–external <4 deg, medial–lateral <3 mm, anterior–posterior <2 mm, superior–inferior <2 mm), (b) sensitivity analysis comparing the impact of mean ±1 standard deviation of ligament stiffness (K) and reference strain (EREF) on TF internal–external and anterior–posterior kinematics. Mean and standard deviations obtained from the literature (see Table 1).

(a) Comparison of model and experimental TF kinematics for the lunge activity: experiment and calibrated model predictions (RMS difference of TF flexion–extension <3 deg, varus–valgus <2.5 deg, internal–external <4 deg, medial–lateral <3 mm, anterior–posterior <2 mm, superior–inferior <2 mm), (b) sensitivity analysis comparing the impact of mean ±1 standard deviation of ligament stiffness (K) and reference strain (EREF) on TF internal–external and anterior–posterior kinematics. Mean and standard deviations obtained from the literature (see Table 1).