Table 2.
Distribution of the canine parvovirus variants in the world.a
Continent/country | Number of strains detected |
||
---|---|---|---|
CPV-2a | CPV-2b | CPV-2c | |
Europe | |||
Italy | 56 | 6 | 62 |
Portugal | 0 | 16 | 15 |
Spain | 3 | 1 | 9 |
France | 0 | 9 | 7 |
UK | 117 | 182 | 1 |
Belgium | 17 | 0 | 9 |
Germany | 13 | 18 | 21 |
Greece | 81 | 1 | 2 |
Switzerland | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Czech Republic | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Romania | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Hungary | 27 | 0 | 0 |
Bulgaria | 31 | 9 | 1 |
Slovenia | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Africa | |||
Tunisia | 15 | 21 | 14 |
North America | |||
USA | 1 | 36 | 30 |
South America | |||
Uruguay | 1 | 0 | 24 |
Argentina | 9 | 4 | 14 |
Brazil | 37 | 0 | 0 |
Asia | |||
India | 37 | 4 | 0 |
India | b | b | 3 |
Taiwan | 2 | 34 | 0 |
Korea | 119 | 7 | 0 |
Japan | 4 | 21 | 0 |
China | 27 | 5 | 0 |
Thailand | 19 | 7 | 0 |
Oceania | |||
Australia | 41 | 1 | 0 |
Adapted from Greene and Decaro (in press).
Sixteen samples were positive for CPV-2a or CPV-2b, which one was not determined.